June 2010 - CRUX-ARM - lists.crux-arm.nu

[PATCH] pkgmk.in: Fix to remove hardcoded framework path in .la files
by Victor Martinez 10 Jun '10

10 Jun '10

- find $PKG -type f -name '*.la' -exec sed "s|$CLFS||g" -i {} \; + find $PKG -type f -name '*.la' -exec sed -e "s|$CLFS||g" -e "s|$CROSTOOLS/$CTARGET|/usr|g" -i {} \; } check_footprint() {

3 4

[PATCH] coreutils: Patch to don't build man pages (provided in a new source).
by Victor Martinez 10 Jun '10

10 Jun '10

name=coreutils version=8.4 -release=3 +release=4 source=(http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/$name/$name-$version.tar.gz - coreutils-uname.patch) + coreutils-uname.patch \ + coreutils-8.4_manpages.tar.bz2) build() { cd $name-$version patch -p1 -i $SRC/coreutils-uname.patch - - for f in $(find man/ -type f -name '*.x' -exec basename {} .x \;); do - touch $f $f.1 - done + sed "s|SUBDIRS = lib src doc man po tests gnulib-tests|SUBDIRS = lib src tests gnulib-tests|g" -i Makefile.in cat > config.cache <<EOF ac_cv_search_clock_gettime=no @@ -50,5 +48,5 @@ EOF install -d $PKG/bin mv $PKG/usr/bin/{cat,chgrp,chmod,chown,cp,date,dd,df,echo,false,ln,ls,mkdir,sleep} $PKG/bin mv $PKG/usr/bin/{mknod,mv,pwd,readlink,rm,rmdir,stty,sync,touch,true,uname} $PKG/bin - rm -r $PKG/usr/share + mv $SRC/usr/man $PKG/usr/ }

3 2

Doubts about 'bsdtar -m'
by Tilman Sauerbeck 03 Jun '10

03 Jun '10

Hi, in pkgutils-cross.git, commit 3f0931c4294981d3e3edb8c8ba8e422a4dd3a442 you added the -m flag to the bsdtar call that's used to extract source archives. That flag causes bsdtar to ignore the mtimes contained in the archive. This causes build failures for eg the module-init-tools port: In module-init-tools-3.11.1.tar.bz2, aclocal.m4 is stored after configure. When extracting with -m, aclocal.m4 will have a newer mtime than configure. When you call make, it will realize the time difference and will regenerate the configure script. For me, the newly created configure script then fails horribly. I don't think you should need -m. Can you give an example of what problem it fixed? Regards, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

2 7